FOURTH CRITICAL STUDIES CONFERENCE
“Development, Logistics, and Governance”
(8-10 September 2011)
Name of the Session XI: Reading change: The Politics of Democracy and Revolution
———————————————Start Module A———————————————
Abstract
After nearly three decades of armed conflict Sri Lanka is now one of South Asia’s calmest and fastest-growing economies while its strategic location in the Indian Ocean has invited significant post-war investment from both Asian giants China and India. The island’s social indicators, apart from the northeast, remain the best in the region. Its growth rate is up at around eight percent, and its stock markets have over performed since war ended in May 2009, while tourists are back to enjoy the island’s natural beauty. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) recently congratulated the government which had stressed economic development and reconstruction as a means of reducing differences that led to conflict, when it released a Standby Agreement (SBA) loan tranche despite the high ratio of public debt to GDP. Stock market booms, however, do not necessarily correlate with socio-economic peace, equity and justice, or the real economy. While there has been steady progress in de-mining and return of internally displaced persons in the northeast two years after the end of war, a military business model of post-war economic development has emerged with implications for democratic governance, post-war justice, and reconciliation. This paper also seeks to contextualize the paradox of Sri Lanka’s post-war militarization with growth in the wider South Asian context. With India the world’s largest democracy, Sri Lanka with a mere 21 million people is the only other county in the region with unbroken if tattered democracy since independence from the British Raj in 1947/48.
Bionote
———————————————Start Module B———————————————
———————————————Start Module C———————————————
Abstract
First, I propose to look into one particular text. A very powerful Bengali novel, Kangal Malsat. It is written by Nabarun Bhattacharya, one of the most radical of contemporary Bengali litterateurs. While the form of the novel—intertextuality, self-reflexivity, et al—may invite post-modern fandango, our focus is different. This novel tries to deal with the concepts of insurrection, revolution and war against state in minute detail and with commendable theoretical nuance. Local, traditional knowledge corpus and international solidarities combine in fantastic ways to make a subaltern-led war on the government of Bengal possible. Resources and networks of trust are tapped into, patterned and created by the rebels perturbed by pervasive inequality. The loud tone, the carnivalesque ambience and the fantasy genre should not obfuscate the underlying guideline for a possible revolution. The intractable problems, the looming threat of failure are all touched upon, but this text is indeed a rich source of how a community of sufferers plans, manages and builds, block by block, resistance. In doing this, the intentionality of the author will be understood by complimentary readings of his other texts, and his communicative situation constructed through the author’s commentaries on his own writings.
Then on I would draw on my nascent fieldworks and research on segments of laborers in the city’s transport sector and meditate on the commonalities with and deviations from the modes of resistance planned in Nabarun Bhattacharya’s oeuvre. In a political environment where official parliamentary left has become an ally of state and capital, the alternative is a consolidation of conservative forces and the two strategies of coercive flexibilization and deliberate fragmentation are pervasive in the sites of labour and production, corroding the possibility of proletarian politics, we need to understand articulations of the tortuous logistics of revolutionary struggle, be it texts or movements or quotidian struggles, without insinuating that these must be mutually exclusive sets.
Bionote
Agnibho Gangopadyay studied history in Presidency College, Kolkata, and Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. He is associated with Calcutta Research Group, a Kolkata-based research collective. His interests include intellectual history or history of ideas, oral history, labour history and ethnography. He will start his DPhil in History from the University of Oxford in September 2011. His aim is to establish textual studies within archival regimes of research. Weary of specialization, he would want to work on labour history workshops after his doctoral research in the area of intellectual history. A monograph on the land acquisition and its aftermath in Singur written by him will be coming out shortly.